Posted on

My Lockdown Experience So Far

Kelly and I have been working from home for over nine weeks now. The IHS office has been closed for eight, which is roughly how long most statewide shelter-in-place / stay-at-home orders have been in effect.

Here’s what a typical day looks like for me:

  • Wake up and spend time with Henry
  • Drop Henry off at daycare
  • Go for a run
  • Work
  • Do yoga & eat lunch or eat lunch & read
  • Work
  • Pick up Henry
  • Spend time with Henry
  • Henry’s bed time
  • Dinner and a TV show with Kelly
  • Read / play a videogame / write some code
  • Bed

In the beginning I was largely goofing off. There was a lot more videogaming and a lot less reading or running. After about two weeks I tried to mentally shift from a short-term vacation from reality to a longer-term attempt at normality.

For me, this is more or less working fine. I don’t mean to brag. Kelly & I are lucky to not only be gainfully employed but have a childcare provider still able to operate. I understand there are people whose lives are being absolutely destroyed under lockdown. I want us to return to normal as soon as possible. But given the situation we are in, I’m glad to have built a routine that works for me.

Even if Virginia lifted all restrictions tomorrow, I anticipate following this schedule for months voluntarily. I would not be surprised if I’m not in the IHS office again until 2021.

I’ve been meaning to write more during this period, both to document what it’s like for posterity and because I (in theory) have the time. I plan to write about:

  • My thoughts on the lockdown policies
  • Running
  • What I’ve been reading
Posted on

Radical Candor

I’m reading Radical Candor: Be A Kick-Ass Boss Without Losing Your Humanity by Kim Scott. In a nutshell, the message of the book is: Be honest. That sounds simple enough, but how often do you avoid being honest because it is difficult or uncomfortable? I know I’m guilty.

So far I have found the book helpful but unsurprising. Being honest makes sense to me. Giving people negative feedback before things spiral out of control makes sense to me. I already knew this.

As I thought about how I can be better in implementing the ideas of the book, I realized radical candor requires clarity of mind. You can’t give honest feedback if you don’t know your honest thoughts. 

Clarity of mind is something I struggle with. I like to plan and execute projects but I’m uncomfortable reflecting. I don’t enjoy introspection.

It can be tempting to not give negative feedback because you are afraid of the discomfort this might cause. I can think of times where I not only held back feedback, but my brain effectively tricked itself into removing my critique from my mind. Sensing there would be no utility in the information, my brain discarded it. I might be crazy, but I think the brain plays tricks like that.

So I’m not only thinking about how to use radical candor, I’m thinking about strategies for keeping my mind clear. As I previously wrote, I meditate regularly (well, I have let myself slip and it’s now semi-regularly). This blog helps too. After trying to write regularly for only a few weeks, I can tell you writing is a challenging but rewarding method for gaining mental clarity.  

Posted on

Book Review: Getting Things Done

Today I read Getting Things Done by David Allen. Published in 2001, Gettings Things Done (GTD) is a classic among modern business / self-help books. Although I only gave it the speed read I typically give this style of books, I enjoyed GTD and found it worth its widespread acclaim.

GTD is all about organizing your life so that it is less stressful and more productive. GTD details how to organize all your stuff, turning your various inputs (emails, mail, thoughts, conversations) into usable parts that you can organize and structure in order to better attack and carry out your life’s projects. In addition to all the stuff, Allen addresses how to organize one’s projects so that your actions best help you carry out the big-picture goals of the project.

As with most books of this style the first third is good content, the second third helps detail that content, and the final third reinforces the importance of using that content. However basic Allen’s advice may be, it is useful for all persons to revisit. When I had less responsibilities in my prior role with my current employer, I think I was able to get by with bad habits and those bad habits have been reinforced. I’m struggling to succeed by using those bad habits with a larger role. Time to put these new tips into practice!

Posted on

Book Review: Good Profit by Charles Koch

I finished reading Good Profit by Charles G. Koch. Last year I read Koch’s The Science of Success  (I believe those are his only two books). Both books are guides to Koch’s management philosophy, Market-Based Management. Market-based management attempts to use economic knowledge to apply the tools which allow free market economies to prosper (property rights, free exchange, profit and loss) within the contexts of a firm.

Koch is Chairman and CEO of Koch Industries. Along with his brother David, Charles is one of the wealthiest people alive. Koch is also a classical liberal who has dedicated a lot of time and money to classical liberal causes such as the Charles Koch Institute and the Institute for Humane Studies.

In the first section of the book, Koch writes of his early years from his childhood to his first days in business. He particularly focuses on the lessons of his father, who left behind the family business to his sons.

The bulk of the book details the five core components of market-based management: Vision, Virtue and Talents, Knowledge Processes, Decision Rights and Incentives. A firm should have a clear vision that expresses how it will use its capabilities to improve people’s lives. Employees should have the right virtue and talents to contribute to the firm (virtue is more important than talent). Firms should be structured such that the right information is available to the right people. Employees should have clearly defined rights over the decisions they can make based on their ability to contribute to the firm’s long-term profit. Policies and compensation should be set so that employees face incentives which encourage them to act in the interests of the long-term profits of the firm.

In the final section, Koch runs through four brief case studies of applied market-based management.

Whereas The Science of Success reads like a how-to manual for implementing market-based management, Good Profit definitely reads like Koch’s manifesto. The book did not address my reasons for skepticism of market-based management. To try and summarize those concerns very briefly, my gut tells me that market-based management is a misapplication of economic concepts to the wrong contexts. Firms exist because of transaction costs, a concept I don’t find addressed by the structure of market-based management.

Koch doesn’t address criticisms of market-based management in the book, but presents the tremendous success of Koch Industries as a testament to the power of his business philosophy. Besides Koch’s two books, I have encouraged market-based management in working with organizations supported by Koch such as the Charles Koch Institute. I find some concepts (decision rights) more compelling than others (incentives). I would be really interested to have the opportunity to experience market-based management working in a firm that fully embraces it, especially in a for-profit context.

Posted on

Book Review: The Last Safe Investment

The Last Safe Investment: Spending Now To Increase Your True Wealth Forever by Michael Ellsberg and Bryan Franklin is a combination self-help and retirement-planning book. The authors argue that the typical American retirement plan is broken. They offer an alternative that will better serve one’s retirement as well as one’s present and near future. At its core, the author’s alternative is about viewing yourself as your primary investment vehicle for your future.

Ellsberg and Franklin introduce three “true wealth disciplines”: systematic spending, increasing your value to other people, and improving your happiness exchange rate. These disciplines, when cultivated, lead to three “true wealth assets”: adviser equity, tribe, and savings. If you invest in yourself by building the three disciplines, the three assets will better provide you with a happy retirement than the 401ks and vacation homes of a traditional retirement plan.

True Wealth Disciplines
Spend systemically: Evaluate the value of spending within your whole life not just that item’s category. View expenses as life investments and spend accordingly.
Increase your value to other people: Your value to others = match between your behavior and other people’s desired outcomes. Investing in your value is your greatest leverage point to increase your future earnings.
Improve your happiness exchange rate: Figure out what makes you happy. Figure out how to increase happiness efficiently (more happiness for less dollars).

True Wealth Assets
Adviser equity: Provide value to new enterprises, typically in the from of advice but maybe other forms of labor. Get equity, cash it in some point in the future.
Tribe: Community of people who share same values and are connected to one another. Provide you with resources/earning potential and also will make you happier (connections and experiences)
Savings: Cold hard cash set aside. Yes, this excludes monetary investments such as stocks and bonds.

For a majority of the book, Ellsberg and Franklin outline “super skills” which are the best ways to increase your value to other people. Super skills are presented in four categories: interpersonal (leadership/influence, public speaking, visioning, teaching, selling, networking and building tribe, and holding paradox), creative (context importing, improvisation, writing, copywriting, reading, storytelling, and design), technical (mental models, financial models, systems thinking, web development, direct marketing), and physical (longevity, mental focus, clean healthy appearance, clean and organize environment, healthy relationship with substances, and healthy relationship with your sexuality).

I would grade the book as fair. Ellsberg and Franklin present a novel solution to a commonly perceived problem. I am not totally sold on their system, not enough to stop contributing to my IRA. Their true wealth disciplines are all fine pieces of advice. Nothing revolutionary there, but also enough off the beaten path to be worth writing. The true wealth assets part of the equation is where I’m very skeptical of their advice.

I’m not convinced that after a lifetime of following their true wealth disciplines you are better off with adviser equity, tribe, and savings than a 401k and a vacation home. The stock market is robust in the long run and if you start early (see my next point about willpower) you should be set up for life, especially if you practice the true wealth disciplines. Adviser equity sounds like a nice but unpredictable way to score big (like trying to pick individual stocks). Some people hate tribe! And savings is nice, but again, I’m not quite sure why the authors are so averse to setting up an IRA over cash and money market funds.

Another flaw in the book is the authors’ dismissal of willpower. In the introduction they say any workable plan (which they argue theirs is), “must not rely on willpower, or behaviors that people know they should do but few actually do”. Retirement is just a form of saving and saving is all about delaying gratitude (an exercise of willpower). The requirements of the book’s plan (spending systematically, increasing your value to other people, and improving your happiness exchange rate) all require willpower. In fact, I think the authors spend most of their book telling the reader what “they should do but few actually do!” This caught my attention after reading Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength by John Tierney and Roy Baumeister. I think Ellsberg and Franklin provide good advice that most of us should follow, but they are kidding themselves if they don’t think it relies on greater willpower to put in practice.

Ellsberg and Franklin’s true wealth disciplines are good advice worth following. I want to incorporate them into my life. But I’m not in a rush to center my future around adviser equity, tribe, and cash savings.

PS – Thank you to my friend Isaac Morehouse for the book recommendation!

Posted on

September Reading

This month, I am attempting to blog regularly to get my writing skills back into practice. My original goal was to write a post every day, but I didn’t set aside time over my birthday weekend to write anything. Maybe I will stick to writing every weekday. Regardless, my goal is to write regularly.

Last month, I focused on reading. In the month of September I read:

  1. Hiring The Best by Martin Yate
  2. The Four-Hour Work Week by Timothy Ferriss
  3. The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels by Alex Epstein
  4. The Last Policeman by Ben Winters
  5. Countdown City by Ben Winters
  6. World of Trouble by Ben Winters
  7. The Problem of Political Authority by Michael Huemer
  8. The Man Who Loved Only Numbers by Paul Hoffman
  9. Anything That’s Peaceful by Leonard Read
  10. Willpower by Roy Baumeister and John Tierney
  11. Thinking As A Science by Henry Hazlitt
  12. The Science of Success by Charles Koch
  13. The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis
  14. Prince Caspian by C.S. Lewis
  15. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader by C.S. Lewis
  16. The Silver Chair by C.S. Lewis
These books fell into three general categories which dominate my overall reading: economics/philosophy, management, and fiction. In total I read 16 books in 30 days at a pace of roughly two days per book. Sure, the last 4 books from the Narnia series (which I still want to finish) are children’s books. But on the other hand, The Problem of Political Authority was difficult and required a lot of attention! 
There weren’t many within economics/philosophy, but my favorite was The Problem of Political Authority. Huemer did a knockout job in the first half of the book and provides a lot of ammunition for anarcho-capitalists arguing with statists about the necessity and moral authority of governments. In finally getting around to Anything That’s Peaceful, I was struck with the importance of faith to Read’s case for a free society. His central thesis aside (which I found convincing), Alex Epstein reminded me in The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels how energizing Objectivists can be because of their love for life. 
While I was not completely sold on the interviewing and hiring system outlined in Hiring The Best, it demonstrated to me the importance of a system. I wasn’t blown away by the findings presented in Willpower but the evidence in favor of willpower’s existence, importance, and potential for cultivation was interesting. Thinking As A Science was underwhelming and felt like more of a pet project than a worthwhile contribution. While I was already familiar with many of the concepts in The Science of Success due to my work in the libertarian movement, I was surprised to see how well it meshed with The Lean Startup by Eric Ries. Paul Erdos, the subject of The Man Who Loved Only Numbers, was an interesting and funny character but the book didn’t draw me in to the mathematical topics. 
The majority of my reading in September was fiction. The The Last Policeman trilogy was a real pageturner that drew me in to the world so much that I woke up the next morning thinking the world was really going to end in a few months. My favorite book was Countdown City, full of humorous insights for a detective novel. World of Trouble was a well-executed finale. I don’t have much to say about the Narnia series, but may write a separate post about it when I finish the other three books.